Hyundai Genesis Forum banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
The Dude
Joined
·
2,120 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
U.S. automakers trim back amount of options

DETROIT - When American consumers start buying new cars again, they'll likely find fewer combinations of moon roofs, seat upholstery and stereo systems to choose from. As with better fuel economy, it's a case of U.S. automakers taking a cue from their Japanese counterparts.

A buyer of the 2008 Ford Fusion could choose from the various models and extra features available and come up with 2,600 combinations. For the 2010 version due in showrooms this summer, the number drops to 104.

The Toyota Camry and the Honda Accord were the two best-selling cars in the U.S. in 2008. The people who purchased more than 800,000 of them combined last year picked from a total of just 15 versions. For the Accord, the models or trim levels were limited to just four, each level complete with a variety of extra bells and whistles.

The American car makers need to cut costs. Sales are at a 26-year low. General Motors Corp. and Chrysler are surviving on government loans. A reduction in options not only streamlines the manufacturing process, but also cuts engineering, design and marketing costs, said Laurie Harbour-Felax, an industry consultant. Those costs often total more than the manufacturing costs.

"The industry has way too many brands, too many models, too much choice, to be efficient," said Mike Maroone, president and chief operating officer of AutoNation Inc., the largest automobile retailer in the country. The Japanese companies' approach "may not serve every niche but it's a much more efficient business model."

Domestic automakers and dealers have tried to guess which combinations will resonate with consumers, and build more cars of that configuration. Still, if only 1,000 people buy a particular combination the company will keep offering it, even if it's not cost effective, said Harbour-Felax.

"It's driven hugely by the sales and marketing guys, that's 1,000 people they don't want to lose," she said. "The Japanese will not create complexity at really low volume to keep one customer."

Harbour-Felax said Honda Motor Co. is a leader when it comes to simplicity and eliminating customer confusion. The car buyer spends less time in the dealership.

And customers save money because adding options individually often costs more than upgrading to the next trim-level. For example, a Chevrolet Impala LS sells for about $23,000 while the Impala LT costs $800 more. It would cost $2,000 to add the LT's additional options to the LS model, said Michael Carr, sales manager for Bobby Layman Chevrolet in Columbus, Ohio.

Honda's CRV crossover, for example, comes in three versions or trim lines: The LX or base level, the EX, a midlevel option, or the EX-L, a high-end option that comes with leather seats. Consumers can choose to install a navigation system in the EX-L model only.

"The reason we do that is to keep manufacturing simple, but we work within that theory to make sure customers still have that choice," said American Honda spokesman Chuck Schifsky.

The most complex choice Michelene St. Amand had to make when purchasing a new 2006 Honda Accord — her third — was whether or not to get a spoiler on the vehicle.

"I didn't have to dicker about getting a model with a moon roof, but without seat heaters. It made the whole process relatively pain free. That would seem like an example Ford and the others should emulate," said the Watertown, Mass. resident.

The Detroit Three, meanwhile, continue to streamline features to keep up with Honda and Toyota Motor Corp., Harbour-Felax said.

General Motors Corp. streamlined options for many of its models over the last two years, offering three to four main trim levels for its popular Chevrolet Malibus and Cobalts.

It was common for Chrysler LLC to offer 10,000 different vehicle combinations, accounting for different variations of transmissions, safety, and interior features.

Now they're trying to get the number of combinations down to 1,000 for some of their major models, such as the Sebring.

"People don't have the money to spec out a $50,000 car anyway," Harbour-Felax said.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,511 Posts
Great, just what we need, more of the BIG 3 giving us what we will get, and telling us to like them for it. Isn't this how they got into trouble in the first place? Boring cars, take it or leave it. Bad quality, take it or leave. Now they are just down to take it the way we like and screw you. May save money, hopefully that will mean no need to continue cheap ass plastic interiors. They may finally upgrade to something respectable for the price and segment.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
292 Posts
I don't see what's so bad about that kind of thinking, Just look at the Gen coupe, there's 4 trim levels for the 2.0, and the 3.8 each, and everybody seems happy with that. Sure there's things some people would like that may not come on their package of choice, but I don't think that's gonna be a deal breaker for most people. Like the article stated:
The Toyota Camry and the Honda Accord were the two best-selling cars in the U.S. in 2008. The people who purchased more than 800,000 of them combined last year picked from a total of just 15 versions. For the Accord, the models or trim levels were limited to just four, each level complete with a variety of extra bells and whistles.
It doesn't seem to have hurt Toyota or Honda.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
292 Posts
Isn't this how they got into trouble in the first place? Boring cars, take it or leave it. Bad quality, take it or leave.
Actually, they got into trouble partly because of the bad quality, which made people not want to buy their cars, and partly because of extremely inefficient buisness practices like making 1000 different trim levels for the same car. And also by producing essentially the same car under several different brands causing added costs in manufacturing.
 

·
Mini Speeder
Joined
·
212 Posts
U.S. automakers trim back amount of options
The American car makers need to cut costs. Sales are at a 26-year low. General Motors Corp. and Chrysler are surviving on government loans. A reduction in options not only streamlines the manufacturing process, but also cuts engineering, design and marketing costs, said Laurie Harbour-Felax, an industry consultant. Those costs often total more than the manufacturing costs.
welp, i just saw their stocks drop some more today.
it was even on the KOREAN news. GM/Chrysler needs a miracle to be saved now.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,780 Posts
Actually, they got into trouble partly because of the bad quality, which made people not want to buy their cars, and partly because of extremely inefficient buisness practices like making 1000 different trim levels for the same car. And also by producing essentially the same car under several different brands causing added costs in manufacturing.
+1...Bad quality, poor dependability, inefficient business practices.

Too many trim levels & options, producing same car under different name plates, overpaying corporate bosses, spending too much per employee due to unions, etc, they just couldn't be competitive $ for $.

i think its due for this, they need restructureing to be competive anymore
+10000000.......They needed to do this years ago......

Hyundai completely restructured in 1999, about the time we began seeing the 10yr/100k warranty. They started with upper mgmt, then lower mgmt, then business practices, Q&A, retooling, parts purchasing (from more reputable suppliers), job effeciency, & so on. Look where they are 10yrs later.
Point made.:bow:



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,511 Posts
I agree, but the problem we have is that the democrats and unions are in tight due to the dems getting big union support. No way GM goes bankrupt. Buy those GM shares now. This government will not let the union lose its grip.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top